To the editor:
The questions brought up in the Feb. 15 opinions section regarding the L-3/City of Greenville lease negotiations deserve answers. No matter what your opinion on this issue, we can all rest assured of one thing. Time will move on. The only question left to answer is will we move forward with it or be left behind, condemned to repeat the same mistakes.
Negotiations between the City of Greenville and L-3 Communications are significant. There is a lot at stake, mostly in the form of jobs that are already on shaky ground (the result of sequestration fears and a slowdown in work). Nobody has lost sight of that. However, before negotiations begin, there should be communication, both fair and open, between both sides.
The question of who is or isn’t being included on the negotiation committee is valid. However, the real question that needs answering is why is there a committee in the first place?
The City of Greenville has an Airport Advisory Board, whose job it is, among other things, to “conduct studies relative to the development and needs of the Airport.” This board, made up of seven individuals with varying degrees of aviation background, represent the knowledge base critical in making an informed decision. One of the key functions of this group is to help with the review and implementation of lease agreements. With regard to other airport tenants, this board has reviewed and recommended several lease arrangement in the past, even as recently as a month ago. The L-3 negotiation should go through the same course of action that everyone else must go through.
There is a simple solution to this entire problem. Follow the already established procedures and policies. All business, regardless of size or “importance,” should adhere to the same processes. Let’s move beyond the backroom deals and into a better and brighter future.
To the editor:
- Letters to the editor
Health services kudos
I am writing this letter of appreciation because two weeks ago I had my second knee replacement surgery within six months.
Kill the YMCA project
In addressing the city council on July 8th, YMCA board president Andy Bench made a bold and highly questionable claim that raised a red flag in my mind. He referenced the alleged financial commitment made by The Greenville Independent School District to help pay for his proposed $15 million taxpayer funded YMCA.
Applaud Court’s return to interpretive sanity
I applaud the Supreme Court’s return to Constitutional interpretive sanity in its recent finding in favor of Hobby Lobby and other closely held companies, to decline to pay for certain medications that they believe violate their religious beliefs.
Take care of children crossing over border
The beautiful little Hispanic children coming across the border from Mexico and South America…
Not too late to stop proposed YMCA center
n your Wednesday edition, reporter Brad Kellar briefly touched on the comments of Dr. Jerry Ransom at Tuesday’s city council meeting.
Perkins should abstain from YMCA vote
What if you were a judge? What if you were also Board President of a non profit organization?
Say no to YMCA on Tuesday
An April 28, 2013 ad in the Herald Banner stated that the YMCA/Event Center bond would only add an additional 2.5 cents to the Greenville property tax rate.
When I moved back to Greenville after living 17 years in South Texas, I took the advice of my friend, Dr. Bill Thorn, who advised me to become an expert in some field. It didn’t matter what.
Freedom of religion
Texas Constitution and the YMCA
Thanks to Park & Rec
Thank you Kimber Patterson, Brett Quarles and the staff of Greenville Parks and Recreation for the outstanding job you do for our community.
- More Letters to the editor Headlines
- Health services kudos